Legal Opinion
Dempsey v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided January 15, 1993No. 2910430PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIGPEN, Judge.
This is a workmen’s compensation ease.
Upon receiving ore tenus evidence, the trial court found that the injury suffered by Tim G. Dempsey was not job-related, and that Dempsey had not suffered any loss of earning ability.
Dempsey’s claim for workmen’s compensation benefits against his employer, White Consolidated Industries, Inc. (White), was disputed by- White. Following a trial in November 1991, the trial court found that Dempsey had been seriously injured in an automobile accident in 1973, which required a complete hip replacement to the right side. After this prosthesis was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Genpak Corp. v. GibsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Jones v. LeFloreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Allen v. Metro Contract Services, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Crown Textile Co. v. DialCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alamo v. PCH HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Madison Academy, Inc. v. HanveyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- Page v. Cox & Cox, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Page v. Cox & Cox, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004