Legal Opinion

High v. Lenow

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The single question presented in this suit is whether in an action brought on a contract to recover unliquidated damages for breach thereof, the defeated party can complain that the jury rendered a verdict for a sum less than that required by the instructions of the court and less than the evidence warrants.

The suit was instituted by Lenow against High to recover damages for breach of an oral contract. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, fixing damages at $5,800. This was approved by the trial judge. On appeal the Court of Appeals reversed because “the verdict was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Freeman v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Eggleston v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Railroad v. AbernatheyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. International Correspondence School, Inc. v. CrabtreeTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kersey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Benson v. H.G. Hill Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  3. Caldararo Ex Rel. Caldararo v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. Simmons v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Flexer v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API