Legal Opinion
ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. Kvamme
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 1994No. CX-93-944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
Respondent Lorraine Blume, acting in her capacity as personal representative of the estate of Emlyn Jones, served a garnishment notice on Dain Bosworth, Inc. (Dain) in an attempt to satisfy a judgment against appellant Peder Kvamme. Kvamme claimed that his Dain assets were exempt under Minn. Stat. § 550.37, subd. 24 (1990). The trial court disallowed the exemption. On appeal, this court reversed and allowed the exemption. On further review, the Minnesota Supreme Court remanded the case for a determination of the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 550.37, subd. 24.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re TvetenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ESTATE OF JONES BY BLUME v. KvammeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Therrien v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005