Legal Opinion

Martin v. Whitman County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1889No. 605PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from District Gourt, Whitman County. Action by Charles Q. Martin against Whitman county, to recover for making a tax list. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Buekb, C. J.

This ease comes before us by appeal from the judgment of the court below sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint. It appears from the complaint in the action, that in August, 1886, at a regular session of the board of county commissioners of Whitman county, held at Colfax, the county seat, the following order was made by the board, and regularly entered in their proceedings:

“ It is hereby ordered that C. Q. Martin make a tax list of all taxes delinquent in Whitman county, and that he receive therefor five per cent, on the total…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodges v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Driftwood Valley Turnpike Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wells v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Hornblower v. DudenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Smith v. Mayor & Common Council of Sacramento CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Von Rosenberg v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Chase v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Arnold v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API