Legal Opinion

Salsbury v. Sackrider

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1938No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 39,958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill for specific performance of an oral contract with her father, Fred C. Sackrider, deceased, in which it was agreed in 1918 that if she and her husband would come to her father’s farm and make a home for him, he would give her the farm.

Plaintiff and her husband came to the farm, managed it, made a home for deceased, and stayed with him for 18 years until his death in 1936. At that time it was found that deceased had left a will, executed three years before his death, devising the property in question to Fred T. Sackrider, his son, and to his son’s wife. Other property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayes v. SkemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hiles v. First National Bank at FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Caldwell v. GoodenoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. In Re Refior's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pence v. WesselsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hammel v. FoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Van Camp v. Van Camp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fojtik v. LawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. States v. Auto.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API