Legal Opinion

United States v. Munday

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1911No. 593PublishedCited by 13 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. . The facts, which involve the construction of statutes relating to location of coal lands in Alaska, are stated in the opinion. The Solicitor General for the United States.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton

This writ of error is prosecuted by the United States from a judgment sustaining a motion to quash an indictment.

The indictment is founded upon § 5440, Revised Statutes, and charges a conspiracy to defraud the United States by illegally obtaining title to forty contiguous tracts of coal lands in the District of Alaska, aggregating six thousand and eighty-seven acres, collectively known as the Stracey group, and averred to be of the value of ten million dollars.

The indictment is too long to be set out, even in an abbreviated form. The gravamen of the conspiracy chárged is that the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. KeitelSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. BuddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. Trinidad Coal & Coking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States v. ForresterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
  2. United States v. Colorado Anthracite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. United States v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States ex rel. Gottlieb v. Commissioner of Immigration of Port of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. Northern Colorado Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API