Legal Opinion

DeMiglio v. Mashore

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1992No. A052035PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

This is the second appeal in the election contest brought by Concord electors Danny T. DeMiglio and Mary Bacon (hereafter contestants) upon allegations that appellant Lloyd Mashore was not domiciled in Concord at the relevant times and, thus, was ineligible for the office of councilperson.

The Concord electors elected Mashore to their city council on November 7, 1989. Contestants filed a timely election challenge and succeeded in obtaining a judgment annulling his election. The sole issue at trial was whether Mashore had the requisite intent, as defined by statute, to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zeilenga v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Johnson v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Krause v. ApodacaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. MinagarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Aton Center, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of IllinoisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Aton Center, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North CarolinaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  4. Aton Center, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South CarolinaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Aton Center, Inc. v. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of OregonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API