Barker v. Allen
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LOZIER, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs-appellants Barker (husband and wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs) sued defendants-respondents Allen (husband and wife, hereinafter called defendants) for possession of real estate and for damages. Plaintiffs alleged that on January 1, 1952, they were the owners of certain premises in Weaubleau, and that on that date defendants took, and had thereafter unlawfully held, possession thereof. Defendants’ answer “admitted that, on January 1, 1952, they were in possession of the premises,” denied the other allegations of the petition and cross-claimed, alleging that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Anson v. TietzeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Tillman v. HutchersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Eld v. EllisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Sanderson v. McManusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. ZitkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Miller v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Crane v. LoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Staples v. O'REILLYMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Mueller v. LarisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.