Legal Opinion

Esther Shuster v. United States of America, Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, John Does 1-10, ABC Companies 11-20

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 27, 2026No. 1:24-cv-08303Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ¥OR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE □ | HONORABLE KAREN M. WILLIAMS ESTHER SHUSTER, oe Civil Action Plaintiff, aint 3 No. 24-8303-KMW-MIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAUREL. | OPINION BROOK REHABILITATION = AND | HEALTHCARE CENTER, JOHN DOES 1- | 10, ABC COMPANIES 11-20, Defendants. APPEARANCES: Keith J, Gentes, Esq. Mark R. Natale, Esq. MALAMUT & ASSOCIATES, LLC 457 HADDONFIELD ROAD, STE. 500 CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002 Counsel for Plaintiff WILLIAMS, District Judge: I INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Esther Shuster (‘Plaintiff’) brings this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API