Legal Opinion

United States v. Dico, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided February 24, 2014No. 4:10-cv-00503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON BENCH TRIAL

ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge.

This lawsuit arose out of the United States of America’s (“Plaintiff’) claims against Dico, Inc. (“Dico” or “Defendant”) and Titan Tire Corporation (“Titan Tire”) (collectively “Defendants”), under “Sections 106, 107 and 113(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act [“CERCLA”] of 1980.” Compl. (Clerk’s No. 1) ¶2. Plaintiff sought to recover unreimbursed response costs from Defendants, and civil penalties and punitive damages from Dico, in connection with the release and/or the threat of release of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Dico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  2. Renn v. Otay Lakes Brewery, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  3. Zaitzeff v. City of SeattleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API