Legal Opinion
Aragon v. Brown
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 2003No. 22,472PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} This case presents an issue of first impression: whether validly enacted, unambiguous restrictive covenants running with the land (covenants) that do not violate public policy, statutory, or constitutional provisions are subject to a separate requirement of “reasonableness” before they are enforced by injunctive relief. Sixty-seven landowners in the Vista Land Subdivision (Subdivision) filed a complaint for injunctive relief seeking to remove a manufactured home Defendants (the Browns) placed in the Subdivision. The manufactured home violates pre-existing, valid…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Colandrea v. Wilde Lake Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Hill v. Community of Damien of MolokaiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Wilcox v. Timberon Protective AssociationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jones v. SchoellkopfNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Agua Fria Save the Open Space Ass'n v. RoweNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Leigh v. Village of Los LunasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smart v. CarpenterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Luginbuhl v. City of GallupNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.