Legal Opinion

Eastern or Emigrant Cherokees v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1935No. 42077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiffs in their group capacity were one of the parties to the treaty of 1846 (9 Stat. 871) between the United States and the Cherokee Nation of Indians, the Western or Old Settler Cherokees being the other party. The plaintiffs under the terms of the jurisdictional act are authorized to institute suit in their own name, or to act jointly with the Western or Old Settler Cherokees, or to intervene in any suit or suits now pending in the court under *198the authority of the act of Congress of March 19, 1924 (43 Stat. 21, 28), in which the Cherokee Nation is party plaintiff and the United…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Whitmire v. Cherokee NationUnited States Court of Claims · 1895
  3. Cherokee Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Choctaw Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  3. Western (Old Settler) Cherokee Indians ex rel. Owen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API