Legal Opinion
United States v. Lange (In re Netal, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 13, 2013No. BAP No. 13-6007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHERMER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The United States of America (the “Government”) appeals from orders of the bankruptcy court denying: (1) the Government’s motion to approve its superpriority administrative expense claim under § 507(b) of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”); (2) the Government’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (the “Evidentiary Hearing Motion”); and (3) the motion of the Government to alter or amend the bankruptcy court’s denial of its motion for a § 507(b) administrative expense claim. We have jurisdiction over this appeal from the final orders of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank of Olathe, Kansas v. Thomas M. Pontow Ann M. PontowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Sholdan v. DietzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Tri-State Financial, LLC v. LovaldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In re AnthonyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
- Vafer Investment Group, L.L.C. v. Case (In Re Visionaire Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mello v. Wojciechowski (In re Wojciechowski)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Susan H. Mello v. Paul M. WojciechowskiUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2017