Legal Opinion

In Re Ridgely

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 29, 1954No. 19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, C. J.:

There is before us for review under Supreme Court Rule 32, Del. C. Ann., a report of the Censor Committee of the Court recommending disciplinary action against Henry J. Ridgely, a member of the bar and until recently Deputy Attorney General for Kent County. Two cases of alleged unprofessional conduct form the basis of the Committee’s action. Both of them involve the important and delicate question of the representation of conflicting interests by an attorney who occupies the office of a Deputy Attorney General and who is also engaged in private practice.

1. The Villa Case.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of YoungSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Seth v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  4. Duval Ranching Co. v. GlickmanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1996
  5. Citizens Bank of Winfield v. Peiffer (In re Peiffer)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API