Legal Opinion
Mac Lean v. Office of the Director of Regulations
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided December 24, 2002No. GDTC-AA-02-144PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Guy P. MacLean, from a final decision of the Office of the Director of Regulation, the Director of Regulation, barring the plaintiff from the Mohegan Sun. The plaintiff has appealed pursuant to Mohegan Tribal Ordinance (MTO) 95-6.1
1. JURISDICTION
MTO 2002-13 contains several provisions relevant to this appeal. Sec. 1(a) provides that the Agency includes the Office of the Director of Regulation as set forth in MTO 95-2; and (b) provides that the final decision means any final agency action. Sec. 3(a) provides that “a person who is aggrieved by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MacDermid, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Carlson v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Rocque v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- MacLean v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dzwilewski v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004
- Pennella v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2004