Legal Opinion

Eibest v. Planned Parenthood of Stark County

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 21, 2000No. 5:99-cv-02635PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GWIN, District Judge.

In this disability discrimination action, Defendant Planned Parenthood of Stark County (“Planned Parenthood”) seeks summary judgment on the claims brought against it by Plaintiffs Mary Anne Eibest and John Eibest [Doc. 13]. With its motion, the defendant says the plaintiffs have faded to offer any material evidence in support of their federal disability discrimination and related state-law claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I

Plaintiff Mary Anne Eibest is a former employee of Defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Azzam v. Baptist Healthcare Affiliates, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012
  2. Darrell Jeffrey McClure v. Ei Du Pont Nemours and Company d/b/a Corteva AgriscienceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API