Legal Opinion
Beldam v. Garlock Packing Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 10, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity to enjoin the alleged infringement 'of United States patent No. 1,000,293, of August 8, 1911, issued to George H. Robinson as assignor, on packing for piston rods. The object of the patentee was to furnish packing having a fluid-tight joint, one easily constructed and capable of conforming to the shape of the piston rod with which it was used. The packing is known as an anti-friction metal core packing. It is sold in lengths and used on piston rods of varying diameter, without the necessity of shaping to fit circles of a fixed roundness, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Linde Air Products Co. v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Edison v. American Mutoscope & Biograph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Epps v. United Box Board & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- I. P. Morris Corp. v. S. Morgan Smith Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- Matthews v. Koolvent Metal Awning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Matthews v. Koolvent Metal Awning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946