Legal Opinion

United States v. MacKby

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 3, 2002No. C 98-1310 SBAPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE EXCESSIVE FINES CLAUSE

ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

The United States (“Government”) commenced this action against defendant, Peter Mackby, alleging violations of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729. Following a three-day court trial, the Court found in favor of the Government and entered judgment against Mackby in the amount of $729,454.92. Mackby subsequently appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which, in a published opinion, affirmed this Court’s finding of liability but remanded the action “for further development of the record to determine whether the civil penalty and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States of America, Ex Rel. James M. Hagood v. Sonoma County Water Agency, James M. Hagood v. Sonoma County Water AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Peterson v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. 817 N.E. 29th DriveCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter MacKbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  3. State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Pacific Ranger, LLC v. PritzkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. United America v. EghbalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API