Legal Opinion

McCallister v. Wells

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided October 14, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00086Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO In the Matter of: Case No. 4:20-cv-00086-BLW DUSTIN JADE WELLS, MEMORANDUM DECISION Debtor, AND ORDER ______________________________ KATHLEEN McCALLISTER, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN JADE WELLS, Defendant. INTRODUCTION This appeal deals with a so-called “vanishing homestead exemption”1 in the context of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. In 2019, Debtor Dustin Jade Wells declared bankruptcy and claimed his home as exempt under Idaho statutory law. Later, during the pendency of his bankruptcy, Wells sold the home with no intent of reinvesting the proceeds…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. White v. StumpSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In Re Thorpe Insulation Co.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API