Legal Opinion

Benner v. Bell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1992No. 4-91-0738PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages allegedly occasioned by defendant Schrock’s operation of his horse-drawn buggy. The circuit court of Moultrie County entered summary judgment in favor of Schrock. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that Schrock’s failure to illuminate his buggy was a proximate cause of their injuries. We affirm.

The facts are, unless indicated, agreed upon by the parties. About 6 p.m. on February 3, 1989, plaintiffs Jill Benner, her sons Eric and Justin, and Cara Burwell were southbound on the Arthur-Atwood Road, approximately 2V2 miles north of Arthur, Illinois.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Osborne v. Stages Music Hall, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Kotarba v. JamrozikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Northrop v. LopatkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Cannon v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API