Morris v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
An indictment was found by a grand jury of the Washington Circuit Court, against the plaintiff in error; the first count of which charges a burglary, and the second a larceny. He was tried and acquitted of the burglary, and found guilty of the larceny. On his motion, a new trial was granted, which terminated in a similar verdict..
It is now objected, that the second trial for the burglary was improper; and that although it was productive of no direct inconvenience to the plaintiff, it may have had an improper influence against him, on the charge of larceny. This objection is untenable.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by24 opinions
- Jones v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Beattie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Shular v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- People v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.