Legal Opinion

In re Gilpatric

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 25, 1994No. 93-110PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The petitioner, Sandra Gilpatric, challenges the decision of the New Hampshire Department of Labor (department) awarding an eight percent permanent impairment award under RSA 281-A:32 (Supp. 1993) (paragraph XII effective until Jan. 1, 1994) (amended effective Jan. 1, 1994). Gilpatric argues that the department erred in not accepting the dual diagnosis found in a previous superior court order, and in disregarding her expert’s opinion as to impairment. We affirm.

Gilpatric had been employed at the International Packaging Corporation as a factory assembly-line worker for nearly fifteen years…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morin v. J. H. Valliere Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Ainsworth v. ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  3. In re BreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. In re BlakeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. In re BlackfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Contoocook Valley School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Appeal of HookerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Tyler v. Hannaford Bros.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. Hartgers v. Town of PlaistowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Appeal of CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API