Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. School Administrative District No. 35

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 11, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, J.

[¶ 1] Wendy Goodwin appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court (York County, Perkins, A.R.J.) dismissing her complaint to recover attorneys’ fees 1 and costs incurred during special education proceedings regarding her son. Because we conclude that no cause of action exists in Maine law for such fees, we affirm.

I. Background

[¶ 2] Wendy Goodwin is a resident of Eliot and the mother of a student attending Marshwood Junior High School during the 1996-97 school year. Her son qualified as both an “exceptional student” within the meaning of 20-A M.R.S.A. § 7001(2) (1993) 2 and as a “student…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rhodes v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Larrabee v. Penobscot Frozen Foods, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Thiboutot v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maietta Construction, Inc. v. WainwrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. Richards v. Town of EliotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Lichtenstein v. Consolidated Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Baker v. ManterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. McTeague v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API