Legal Opinion

Macarz v. Transworld Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 8, 2001No. 3:97CV2194 JBAPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS

ARTERTON, District Judge.

Following this Court’s ruling on September 21, 1998 granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on his claim that defendant’s debt collection letter violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq., the Court granted class certification on April 19, 2000. Now, plaintiff has moved for approval of its proposed class notice and for an order directing the defendant to mail both the proposed notice and the ruling on liability to all class members. The class certified by the Court’s *56April 19, 2000 ruling…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Schisler v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Imperial Merchant Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  3. Mendez v. Radec Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  4. Hypertouch, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. In re Risk Management Alternatives, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API