United States v. Lind
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KANTOR, Judge:
Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was found guilty of the following offenses: one specification of wrongfully using ecstasy, a Schedule I controlled substance, and one specification of wrongfully distributing ecstasy, both in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a; one specification of conspiring to possess, use, and distribute ecstasy, in violation of Article 81, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 881; and one specification…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. GreeneU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. MedinaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
- United States v. GreeneU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. MedinaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010