Surprenant v. MULCRONE
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Surprenant, appeals the order of the Superior Court {Brown, J.) dismissing his claims against the defendant, Deborah Mulcrone, under the doctrine of absolute quasi-judicial immunity. We affirm.
The following facts derive from the record. The defendant was the guardian ad litem (GAL) for the plaintiff’s son in a contested case between the plaintiff and the son’s mother. The defendant was appointed to investigate how the plaintiff and his son’s mother should divide parenting time and residential responsibility for their son. In her final report to the court, submitted in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dr. Gladys Cok v. Louis CosentinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Beane v. Dana S. Beane & Co., P.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- McNamara v. HershSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Gould v. Director, New Hampshire Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Marr v. Maine Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Signal Aviation Services, Inc. v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Alberto Ramos v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- Amour v. Collection Professionals, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
- Nicole Alward v. Emery Johnston, M.D. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- Steven Dominic v. P Stephen R. Goldman, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.