Legal Opinion

Dr. Gladys Cok v. Louis Cosentino

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 5, 1989No. 88-2086PublishedCited by 341 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises out of the appointment of a guardian ad litem and a conservator of assets by a family court justice during a divorce proceeding. The appellant, Gladys Cok, acting pro se, sued the judge and the two court appointed attorneys. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. We agree and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the court below adding the following comments.

The basis of Cok’s claims under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-242, 1961-1963, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983-1986, is the alleged deprivation of money and property due to the individual and concerted…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by341 opinions

  1. Robert David Figueroa v. Audrey P. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Gladys L. Cok v. Family Court of Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Pinaud v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Darrell Chip Wadena, United States of America v. Jerry Joseph Rawley, Jr., United States of America v. Rick ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Peter J. Hughes, Jr. v. Lynn E. Long Kathleen Lacey Patrick J. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

336 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API