Legal Opinion

Brown v. Leeak

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoiiNsoN, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon a half section of land in Traill County, executed by the defendants, Noah Leeak and his wife. The complaint is in the usual form. The Leeaks defaulted. The trial court decreed a foreclosure of the mortgage. A deficiency judgment was entered against the defendant McMillan. He 'appeals and asks for a trial de novo.

The following statement of facts is contained in appellant’s brief, and is conceded to be correct by the respondent.

“On November 6th, 1920, the defendants, Noah Leeak and Tillie Leeak, executed and delivered to the plaintiff, Nellie B.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. BookerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McDonald v. FinsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Peters v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Trustees of the Old Alms-House Farm v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  5. County of Colusa v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A. v. RebarchekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Siekman v. MolerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hinckley Estate Co. v. GurryIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Augusta Trust Co. v. Augusta, Hallowell & Gardiner RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API