Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Eagle Insurance & Ruiz
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
M. Hallsted Christ, J.
The above-captioned special proceeding was commenced by the petitioner, under CPLR article 75, to stay arbitration of respondents’ respective claims for uninsured motorist benefits.
On December 19, 1986, respondent Ruiz, the petitioner’s assured, was involved in a motor vehicle accident. Corespondent Adams was a passenger in the assured’s vehicle. The adverse vehicle was owned by Felix M. Maldonado.
As gleaned from a review of the applicable police accident report, the vehicle’s operator, Nieves Maldonado, was charged, inter alia, with the violation of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hartford Insurance v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- In re the Arbitration between Maye & BluesteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Wausau Insurance v. PredestinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1992