Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Maye & Bluestein
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1976PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCooke, J.
The arbitration here arose out of deadlocks by both the Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Variable Supplements Fund and the Board of Trustees of the Fire Officers Variable Supplements Fund concerning the adoption of a proposed rule and regulation for the administration of each fund.
Pursuant to sections B19-40.0 et seq. and B19-62.0 et seq. of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, two parallel but separate variable supplement funds were established for the uniformed firemen and the uniformed fire officers of the City of New York. These funds consist of such moneys as may be paid to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Associated General Contractors & Savin Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by21 opinions
- Abramovich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Williams v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Poggi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- DeLuca v. DeLucaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.