Battjes Builders v. Kent County Drain Commissioner
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTemplin, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a denial’ of injunctive relief to prohibit the construction of a proposed county drain in Kent County. Plaintiffs allege some eleven grounds of error which we find, in the main, to be repetitious and without merit. The allegations appear to resolve into two primary questions, namely:
Is the construction of Whiskey Creek Drain ho. 362 conducive to the public health, welfare and convenience as required by the Drain Code of 1956?
Have the required procedures been followed in establishing and constructing the Whiskey Creek Drain project?
Plaintiffs contend that the defendant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Underwood v. National Motor Castings Division, Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
- N. A. Woodworth Co. v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952
- Webber v. Steiger Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Bay Trust Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Project Cost & Special Assessment Roll for Chappel DamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Barak v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hitchingham v. Washtenaw County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Toth v. Waterford TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- ATTORNEY GENERAL Ex Rel DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES v. HURON COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.