Legal Opinion

Alten v. Ellin & Tucker, Chartered

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 6, 1994No. Civ. A. 92-516-JLLPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants, Ellin & Tucker, Chartered (“Ellin & Tucker”) and Joel Kaye (“Kaye”), have moved for summary judgment, (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 37), against plaintiff Steven R. Alten (“Alten”), pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff filed this suit to recover over $140,000.00 of tax penalties imposed upon him personally by the Internal Revenue Service, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672(a), as a “responsible person” who “willfully” failed to pay federal employee withholding taxes. Plaintiff alleges that this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morrison v. International Programs Consortium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. 380544 Canada, Inc. v. Aspen Technology, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Aardema v. FitchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Harris Cnty. v. Harris Cnty. Appraisal Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Aardema v. FitchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API