Legal Opinion

Steele v. Allen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2009No. 07CA2163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAILEY.

Plaintiffs, Jack Steele and Danette Steele, appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of defendants, Katherine Allen and her law firm, Katherine Allen, P.C. The sole issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs stated a claim for relief against defendants for negligent misrepresentation based on alleged erroneous legal advice provided by defendants. We conclude that plaintiffs have stated a claim for negligent misrepresentation, reverse that part of the trial court's judgment dismissing that claim, and remand with directions to reinstate that claim.

I. Factual Background

In May…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coors Brewing Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson v. Central Bank Denver, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. One National Bank v. Joseph M. AntonellisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. O Builders & Associates Inc. v. Yuna Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Allen v. SteeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. O Builders & Associates Inc. v. Yuna Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API