Solomons v. M'Kinstry
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
A WRIT of error was brought to reverse the judgment of the supreme court in this cause. For the facts in the case, and the judgment of the court below, see the S. C., reported in 2 Johns. Rep. p. 57—62.
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Ch. J.,
gave the reasons for the judgment of the ■court below, which were the same as those stated in the report of the case in that court.
The cause was argued by Van Vechten, for the plaintiff in error; and by Woodworth, for the defendant in error.
Cantine, Senator.
On the argument, two objections were urged against the judgment of the supreme court:
1st. That the award was not confined to the subject matter of the submission :
2d. That it was not final. With the latter objection, a want of mutuality in the award was in some measure mixed; but as that was not much relied upon, and as…
2Cited by9 opinions
- McCullough v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Hays v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Joy v. SimpsonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1820
- Blood v. ShineSupreme Court of Florida · 1848
- King v. Kerr's AdministratorsOhio Supreme Court · 1831
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.