Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gardner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1978No. 1494PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erroneously denied his application to dismiss the charges against him pursuant to Rule 1100(f), Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix. 1 Because the incompleteness of the record precludes our review of this contention, 2 we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The complaint in this case, charging appellant with possession of instruments of crime, 3 possession of implements of escape, 4 and criminal attempt, 5 was filed on July 21, 1976. According to Rule 1100(a)(2), 6 the Commonwealth had 180 days, or until January 17, 1977, in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. StricklandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. TomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GroarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. GardnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. CameronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. GroarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. HintonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API