Commonwealth v. Gardner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that the lower court erroneously denied his application to dismiss the charges against him pursuant to Rule 1100(f), Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix. 1 Because the incompleteness of the record precludes our review of this contention, 2 we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The complaint in this case, charging appellant with possession of instruments of crime, 3 possession of implements of escape, 4 and criminal attempt, 5 was filed on July 21, 1976. According to Rule 1100(a)(2), 6 the Commonwealth had 180 days, or until January 17, 1977, in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MyrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. StricklandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. TomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GroarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. GardnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CameronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. GroarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HintonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.