Commonwealth v. Groarke
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
Appellant takes this appeal from his conviction for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Appellant makes three arguments, all challenging the extension of time for trial granted to the Commonwealth under Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure 1100(c). Because of our view of this case, we need only-address ourselves to one of appellant’s arguments. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below we order that a full hearing be held at which time the Commonwealth is to be given the opportunity to show due diligence.
A criminal complaint was filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. WarehamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. KrallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. Conjalko, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1980
- Commonwealth v. GroarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. KurtzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. Lamb, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1980