(PS) Crago v. Lynn
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY J. CRAGO, No. 2:19-cv-02509 MCE AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LYNN, CARD, KNACKE., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se and in forma pauperis, and pre-trial 18 proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 Defendants Lynn, Card, and Knacke, all Sacramento County Sherriff’s Officers, have filed a 20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has opposed 21 the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.