Legal Opinion

Wecht v. PG Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1986No. 00460PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

Appellant, Cyril Wecht, M.D., J.D., initiated this action in trespass against appellees, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, its publisher and various of its editors, agents and employees, alleging that appellees maliciously published a number of articles and editorial cartoons which were false, defamatory and portrayed Dr. Wecht in a false light. The trial court sustained appellees preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. The court held that the publications were not defamatory as a matter of law. Although the court found the publications objectionable to varying…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Rybas v. WapnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Beckman v. DunnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ramunno v. CawleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Maier v. MarettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. JS Ex Rel. Snyder v. Blue Mountain School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Neish v. Beaver Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API