Legal Opinion

Rivervale Realty v. Town of Orangetown, NY

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 29, 1993No. 89 Civ. 2306 (VLB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

This case involves claims by a real estate development company challenging, on various bases, the constitutionality of a local zoning ordinance. Plaintiff has invoked 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

In summary, a local law applicable to property owned by plaintiff Rivervale Realty Co., Inc. (“Rivervale”) and other property owners substituted requirements of two-acre zoning rather than one-acre zoning for each dwelling; pre-existing structures were excluded. Rivervale challenged in state court the environmental study on which this amendment was based; the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frooks v. Town of CortlandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Goldfine v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. S&R DEVELOPMENT ESTATES, LLC v. BassDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Allocco Recycling, Ltd. v. DohertyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Marathon Outdoor, LLC v. VescontiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API