Legal Opinion
Nagy v. Bistricer
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided November 22, 2000No. Civ. A. 18017PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
This opinion resolves motions in a case involving an extremely unusual merger agreement. Defendants David Bistricer and Nachum Stein negotiated the merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) between Riblet Products Corporation (“Ri-blet”) and Coleman .Cable Acquisition, Inc. (“Coleman Acquisition”). Bistricer and Stein are the controlling stockholders and directors of both Riblet and Coleman Acquisition.. They signed the Merger Agreement on behalf of both companies. The Merger Agreement provided for Riblet to be the surviving company in a merger with a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
- Auriga Capital Corp. v. Gatz Properties, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
- Metro Communication Corp. v. Advanced Mobilecomm Technologies Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Comet Systems, Inc. Shareholders' Agent v. MIVA, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.