Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davasher v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 27, 1992No. CR 91-5Published

1DissentRobert L. Brown, Justice

I dissent. Over the years the insanity defense has been whittled away until, with this case, virtually nothing is left.

Our state statutes set out an elaborate scheme for determining mental disease at the time of the offense. See Ark. Code Ann. § 5-2-393, et seq. (1987) and (Supp. 1991). The salient points of the procedure are these:

a. Evidence of a mental disease is admissible to prove whether the defendant had the culpable mental state to commit the offense. § 5-2-304.

b. Once the defendant files notice of a mental-disease defense, the trial court orders a psychiatric examination. §§ 5-2-304,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Moore v. DuckworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Couch v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Westbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API