Legal Opinion

Moore v. Duckworth

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 2, 1979No. 78-5795PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, the petitioner was found guilty by an Indiana jury of murder in the second degree. The Indiana Supreme Court upon direct appeal affirmed the conviction. Moore v. State, 260 Ind. 154, 293 N. E. 2d 28 (1973). The petitioner then sought a writ of habeas corpus in a Federal District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2254. He claimed, inter alia, that he had been denied due process of law because he had been convicted upon evidence allegedly insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was sane at the time the victim was killed. * The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Marshall C. Moore v. Jack P. Duckworth, Warden of the Indiana State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. LombardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  3. State v. NealySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. M. W. Holloway v. Clay E. McElroy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. State v. RoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API