Legal Opinion
Duane Young v. Wipro Limited
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 9, 2026No. 3:25-cv-14949Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DUANE YOUNG, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 25-14949 (GC) (TJB) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION WIPRO LIMITED, Defendant. CASTNER, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendant Wipro Limited’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended putative collective action Complaint (ECF No. 21) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff Duane Young opposed, and Defendant replied. (ECF Nos. 28-29.) The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions and decides the matter without oral…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.