Woodard v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from his bench trial conviction of sexual battery in violation of Code § 18.2-67.4, Roger Lee Woodard contends that the evidence is insufficient to support that conviction because (1) the complaining witness gave inconsistent statements; (2) his alibi evidence required his acquittal; and (3) the Commonwealth failed to prove that he sexually abused the complaining witness against her will by intimidation. Because the Commonwealth failed to prove that the sexual abuse was accomplished by intimidation, we reverse the conviction and remand the case to the trial court.
I
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Lea v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Sutton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- Swanson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crowder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Sabol v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
- Carlos Gomez-Ruotolo v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Johnathan Reeves Robinson v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.