Legal Opinion

Richman v. DeVal Aerodynamics, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 23, 1962PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

185 A.2d 884 (1962)

Jacob S. RICHMAN, Plaintiff

v.

DeVAL AERODYNAMICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, John A. Baldinger, Joseph F. Carrasco, Edward Sawyer, George R. Eulo and John Bello, Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

November 23, 1962.

Irving Morris and Joseph Rosenthal of Cohen & Morris, Wilmington, for plaintiff.

Samuel Handloff, Wilmington, and Jacob S. Richman, Philadelphia, Pa., for DeVal Aerodynamics.

SEITZ, Chancellor.

Cohen and Morris, counsel for Jacob S. Richman, plaintiff in the above-named action, now petition this court for an award of reasonable compensation from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  2. Bosch v. Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Philip Schechtman v. Louis E. WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Mencher v. SachsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  5. Martin Foundation, Inc. v. Phillips-Jones Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  3. In Re First Interstate Bancorp Consolidated Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
  4. Claus v. BabiarzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
  5. Claus v. BabiarzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API