Legal Opinion
Claus v. Babiarz
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided April 8, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 1553PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Short, Vice Chancellor:• This case is now before the court on plaintiffs’ application for the taxing of certain items as costs and for the award of counsel fees and expenses. The merits of this litigation were disposed of by the court’s opinion dated November 7, 1962. See Claus v. Babiarz, 40 Del.Ch. 500, 185 A.2d 283. With respect to the taxing of costs and award of counsel fees it was there held that the individual defendants were not liable for costs or for plaintiffs’ fees. It was also provided in said opinion that the costs of the proceeding were taxed against The Mayor and Council of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Summer Cottagers' Ass'n of Cape May v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Maurer v. International Re-Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Haesloop v. City CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Consolidated Fisheries Co. v. Consolidated Solubles Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claus v. BabiarzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963
- Hutchinson v. Fish Engineering Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1964
- Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Porsh Builders, Inc. v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981