Legal Opinion

George S. May International Co. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 18, 2006No. 04 C 6018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court are Defendant Xcentric Ventures, LLC’s and Defendant Ed Magedson’s Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the following reasons, these Motions are denied.

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Facts

George S. May International Company (“May”) is a management consulting firm which is incorporated, organized, and existing under the laws of Delaware. May’s principle place of business is Park Ridge, Illinois. Xcentric Ventures, LLC (“Xcentric”) is an Arizona limited liability corporation located in Phoenix, Aizona, and is listed as the owner of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rosier v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Richter v. INSTAR Enterprises International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. Rosier v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. uBID, Inc. v. GoDaddy Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Clover Technologies Group, LLC v. Oxford Aviation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API