Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Sallis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1884No. Case No. 1677PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Washington. Tried below before the Hon. I. B. McFarland. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The statement of the nature and result of the suit, as made by counsel for plaintiff in error, is as follows: “P. Eastham obtained judgment, January 11, 1878, against D. E. Sallis in the district court of Washington county, and had the judgment recorded in Lampasas county, where the defendant D. E. Sallis owned one hundred and ninety-five and one-half acres of land.

“ D. E. Sallis executed a mortgage on the same land to J. R. *577Ealston May 23, 1878, to secure a note executed by him to Ealston, and which was recorded in Lampasas county.
“The judgment in favor of Eastham…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stafford v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. McCormick v. Wheeler, Mellick & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Warren v. ShumanTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Administrators of Ligon v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Jordan v. PettySupreme Court of Florida · 1853

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Tri-State Telephone Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Arrington v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Fortson v. AlfordTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Hudgins v. T. B. Meeks Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API