Legal Opinion
In re Hardware Mut. Fire Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1937No. 8566PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners have asked for a writ of mandamus which seeks an order requiring the District Court to retain jurisdiction of *14an action removed to it from the state court because of diversity of citizenship.
The petition alleges that the Roma Wine Company suffered a fire loss amounting in the aggregate to $7,072.23: It brought. suit for that amount against the three petitioning insurance companies alleging a joint liability for the loss. The action was removed to the District Court of the United States upon motion of the insurance companies and the case was tried therein, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Southern Pac. Co. v. McAdooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Ex Parte Matthew Addy Steamship & Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Electro Therapy Products Corporation v. StrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Essie H. Jewell v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Rallo v. Northwestern National InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Possidenti v. Mechanics & Traders InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955