Legal Opinion
Electro Therapy Products Corporation v. Strong
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1936No. 7692PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, a citizen of Delaware, filed its bill of complaint against appellees Strong, Bristow, Jackson, Brooks, and Stock, citizens of California, and appellee Ultra Violet Corporation, Ltd., a citizen of Nevada, alleging that, by written instruments dated December 26, 1929, appellees Strong and Bristow assigned to appellant all inventions theretofore or thereafter made by them relating to therapeutic apparatus or processes, and agreed to execute, at appellant’s request, all papers necessary to assign and set over to appellant the title to said inventions and all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Southern Pac. Co. v. McAdooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by15 opinions
- Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Jones v. BrushCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Leo Mantin v. Broadcast Music, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Royalty Service Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Cheyne v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.